The Fort Magistrate’s Court has directed that facts be reported to the Court of Appeal to consider contempt of court proceedings against politicians Wimal Weerawansa, Udaya Gammanpila, Sugishwara Bandara, Dilith Jayaweera, Asanka Navaratne, and academic Mahinda Pathirana. The order arises from public remarks allegedly made during a satyagraha held between 7–15 July, protesting the arrest of former State Intelligence Service Director Suresh Sallay in connection with the Easter Sunday attacks investigation.
Why the Court Considered Contempt of Court
The Criminal Investigation Department (CID) submitted its investigative findings to Magistrate Pasan Amarasekara, who observed that—on the face of it—the statements made by the individuals appeared to criticise or undermine ongoing judicial proceedings. Under Sri Lankan law, such conduct may constitute contempt of court, particularly when public commentary attempts to influence, obstruct, or scandalise judicial processes.
Sri Lanka’s Contempt of Court Law: Key Points
Sri Lanka does not have a single codified statute on contempt of court. Instead, the law is shaped by:
- Article 105(3) of the Constitution — empowers the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal to punish contempt.
- Judicial precedent — especially cases defining scandalising the court, interference with judicial proceedings, and obstruction of justice.
- Inherent powers of courts — to protect the integrity and independence of the judiciary.
Types of Contempt Relevant Here
- Scandalising the court — making statements that lower public confidence in the judiciary.
- Interference with pending proceedings — public remarks that may influence or prejudice an ongoing case.
- Obstructing justice — actions or speech that attempt to pressure courts or investigators.
The Magistrate’s observation suggests that the alleged statements may fall under interference with pending proceedings and scandalising the court, prompting referral to the Court of Appeal for initiation of formal proceedings.
Political Background of the Accused Individuals
Wimal Weerawansa
Leader of the National Freedom Front (NFF); formerly aligned with the UPFA and later with nationalist political blocs. Known for strong criticism of investigations related to national security and intelligence operations. Tap to explore: Wimal Weerawansa
Udaya Gammanpila
Leader of the Pivithuru Hela Urumaya (PHU); a prominent nationalist politician and former Minister of Energy. Frequently comments on security, sovereignty, and intelligence matters. Tap to explore: Udaya Gammanpila
Sugishwara (Sugi) Bandara
A political activist associated with nationalist movements and public campaigns defending military and intelligence officials. Tap to explore: Sugi Bandara
Dilith Jayaweera
Businessman and political figure; founder of Derana media network and leader of the Mawbima Janatha Party (MJP). Known for strong public positions on national security and governance. Tap to explore: Dilith Jayaweera
Asanka Navaratne
Former MP and political activist aligned with nationalist platforms; active in public protests and commentary on intelligence-related cases. Tap to explore: Asanka Navaratne
Mahinda Pathirana
Senior lecturer and political commentator; frequently participates in public discussions on national security, intelligence, and political reform. Tap to explore: Mahinda Pathirana
Summary of the Court’s Action
- CID submitted investigative findings on statements made during the satyagraha.
- Magistrate found the remarks prima facie capable of undermining judicial proceedings.
- Court ordered referral to the Court of Appeal to consider contempt of court charges.
- Proceedings, if initiated, will examine whether the individuals attempted to influence or scandalise ongoing judicial processes.